|
Saskia
Sassen: University of Chicago Chicago, USA
|
|
THE
GLOBAL CITY: STRATEGIC SITE/NEW FRONTIER (Page 5)
|
THE
LOCALIZATIONS OF THE GLOBAL
|
| |
| Economic
globalization, then, needs to be understood also in its multiple
localizations, rather than only in terms of the broad, overarching
macro level processes that dominate the mainstream account.
Further, we need to see that some of these localizations do
not generally get coded as having anything to do with the global
economy. The global city can be seen as one strategic instantiation
of such multiple localizations. |
| Here
I want to focus on localizations of the global which are marked
by those two features. Many of these localizations are embedded
in the demographic transition evident in such cities, where
a majority of resident workers are today immigrants and women,
often women of color. These cities are seeing an expansion of
low-wage jobs that do not fit the master images about globalization
yet are part of it. Their embeddedness in the demographic transition
evident in all these cities, and their consequent invisibility,
contribute to the devalorization of these types of workers and
work cultures and to the "legitimacy" of that devalorization.
|
| This
can be read as a rupture of the traditional dynamic whereby
membership in leading economic sectors contributes conditions
towards the formation of a labor aristocracy--a process long
evident in western industrialized economies. "Women and immmigrants"
come to replace the Fordist/family wage category of "women and
children"(Sassen 1998: chapter 5). One of the localizations
of the dynamics of globalization is the process of economic
restructuring in global cities. The associated socio-economic
polarisation has generated a large growth in the demand for
low-wage workers and for jobs that offer few advancement possibilities.
This, amidst an explosion in the wealth and power concentrated
in these cities -- that is to say, in conditions where there
is also a visible expansion in high-income jobs and high-priced
urban space. |
| "Women
and immigrants" emerge as the labor supply that facilitates
the imposition of low-wages and powerlessness under conditions
of high-demand for those workers and the location of those jobs
in high-growth sectors. It breaks the historic nexus that would
have led to empowering workers and legitimates this break culturally.
|
| Another
localization which is rarely associated with globalization,
informalization, re-introduces the community and the household
as an important economic space in global cities. I see informalization
in this setting as the low-cost (and often feminized) equivalent
of deregulation at the top of the system. As with deregulation
(e.g. as in financial deregulation), informalization introduces
flexibility, reduces the "burdens" of regulation, and lowers
costs, in this case especially the costs of labor. Informalization
in major cities of highly developed countries--whether new York,
London, paris or Berlin-- can be seen as a downgrading of a
variety of activities for which there is an effective demand
in these cities-- but also a devaluing and enormous competition
given low entry costs and few alternative forms of employment.
Going informal is one way of producing and distributing goods
and services at a lower cost and with greater flexibility. This
further devalues these types of activities. Immigrants and women
are important actors in the new informal economies of these
cities. They absorb the costs of informalizing these activities.(See
Sassen 1998: chapter 8). |
|
The
reconfiguration of economic spaces associated with globalization
in major cities has had differential impacts on women and
men, on male-typed and female-typed work cultures, on male
and female centered forms of power and empowerment. The restructuring
of the labor market brings with it a shift of labor market
functions to the household or community. Women and households
emerge as sites that should be part of the theorization of
the particular forms that these elements in labor market dynamics
assume today.
|
| These
transformations contain possibilities, even if limited, for
women's autonomy and empowerment. For instance, we might ask
whether the growth of informalization in advanced urban economies
reconfigures some types of economic relations between men and
women? With informalization, the neighborhood and the household
re-emerge as sites for economic activity. This condition has
its own dynamic possibilities for women. Economic downgrading
through informalization, creates "opportunities" for low-income
women entrepreneurs and workers, and therewith reconfigures
some of the work and household hierarchies that women find themselves
in. This becomes particularly clear in the case of immigrant
women who come from countries with rather traditional male-centered
cultures. |
| There
is a large literature showing that immigrant women's regular
wage work and improved access to other public realms has an
impact on their gender relations. Women gain greater personal
autonomy and independence while men lose ground Women gain more
control over budgeting and other domestic decisions, and greater
leverage in requesting help from men in domestic chores. Also,
their access to public services and other public resources gives
them a chance to become incorporated in the mainstream society--they
are often the ones in the housheold who mediate in this process.
It is likely that some women benefit more than others from these
circumstances; we need more research to establish the impact
of class, education, and income on these gendered outcomes.
Besides the relatively greater empowerment of women in the household
associated with waged employment, there is a second important
outcome: their greater participation in the public sphere and
their possible emergence as public actors. There are two arenas
where immigrant women are active: institutions for public and
private assistance, and the immigrant/ethnic community. The
incorporation of women in the migration process strengthens
the settlement likelihood and contributes to greater immigrant
participation in their communities and vis a vis the state.
For instance, Hondagneu-Sotelo (1995) found immigrant women
come to assume more active public and social roles which further
reinforces their status in the household and the settlement
process. Women are more active in community building and community
activism and they are positioned differently from men regarding
the broader economy and the state. They are the ones that are
likely to have to handle the legal vulnerability of their families
in the process of seeking public and social services for their
families This greater participation by women suggests the possibility
that they may emerge as more forceful and visible actors and
make their role in the labor market more visible as well. |
| There
is, to some extent, a joining of two different dynamics in the
condition of women in global cities described above. On the
one hand they are constituted as an invisible and disempowered
class of workers in the service of the strategic sectors constituting
the global economy. This invisibility keeps them from emerging
as whatever would be the contemporary equivalent of the "labor
aristocracy" of earlier forms of economic organization, when
a low-wage worker' position in leading sectors had the effect
of empowering that worker, i.e. the possibility of unionizing.
On the other hand, the access to (albeit low) wages and salaries,
the growing feminization of the job supply, and the growing
feminization of business opportunities brought about with informalization,
do alter the gender hierachies in which they find themselves.
|
|
|